Differences In Conventional Method Of Mobilization Of Section Caesarea And ERACS Method Of Section Caesarea At Sunan Kudus Islamic Hospital In 2023

Abstract

Sectio Caesarea (SC) is a way to deliver a fetus by making an incision in the uterine wall through the front wall of the abdomen. Currently, there are several methods for performing SC surgery, namely conventional and ERACS, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. recovery time after SC surgery with ERACS has good results, namely a reduction in the overall length of post-operative care and an increase in recovery time for patients to mobilize or carry out activities. Reduced hospitalization, fewer complications, and faster functional recovery are some of the advantages of the ERACS technique compared to conventional cesarean section. This research aims to determine the difference between the mobilization of Sectio Caesarea using the traditional method and Sectio Caesarea using the Eracs method at Sunan Kudus Islamic in 2023. Method: The method used in this research is quasi-experimental. with a non-equivalent control group design. The respondents studied were 37 people divided into two groups using conventional methods and ERACS. Data analysis used the independent t-test. Results: All SC patients were mobilized using the Eracs method (19 people/100%) and were able to mobilize quickly. Mobilization of SC patients using conventional methods can mostly mobilize in the moderate category as many as 11 (61.1%).In the results of different tests using the t-test, a p-value of 0.000 <0.05 was obtained. Conclusion: There is a significant difference in mobilization time for mothers post-conventional CS and ERACS in the intervention group and control group at Sunan Kudus Islamic Hospital.